Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Hacking of White House E-mail Affected Diverse Departments

WASHINGTON — The computer phishing attack that Google says originated in China was directed, somewhat indiscriminately, at an unknown number of White House staff officials, setting off the Federal Bureau of Investigation inquiry that began this week, according to several administration officials.

It is unclear how many White House staff members — or those of other departments in the executive branch — might have been affected, according to two officials with knowledge of the investigation. But the intended victims ranged across various functions in the White House, and were not limited to those working on national security, economic policy or trade areas that would be of particular interest to the Chinese government.

Administration officials said they had no evidence any confidential information was breached, or even that many people fell for the attack by providing information that would allow a breach of their Gmail accounts.

White House classified systems run on dedicated lines and information on those systems, the officials said, cannot be forwarded to Gmail accounts. But investigators were trying to determine if the attackers believed that some staff members or other officials used their personal e-mail accounts for confidential government communications.

“Right now,” said one senior official, “that’s a theory, not a fact.”

Google disclosed the attack this week and said that it was directed at not only American government officials, but also human right activists, journalists and South Korea’s government. Google tracked the attack to Jinan, China, which is the home to a Chinese military regional command center.

But that does not necessarily mean the attackers were Chinese or related to the government. The Chinese government denied any involvement.

The attack used e-mails that appeared to be tailored to their victims, the better to fool them, a technique known as spear phishing. Recipients were asked to click on a link to a phony Gmail login page that gave the hackers access to their personal accounts.

The attacks come as the United States government considers expanding its use of Web-based software for e-mail, along with word processing, spreadsheets and other kinds of documents. Google is one of the many companies vying for the business with its Apps product, as is Microsoft.

Web based e-mail would be vulnerable to hackers who steal login information through phishing attacks. But Web-based systems are not necessarily any easier to hack than traditional e-mail, which a government agency would usually manage using its own servers, said Larry Ponemon, chairman of the Ponemon Institute, a computer security firm in Traverse City, Mich.

Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, said on Thursday that all White House-related electronic mail was supposed to be conducted on work e-mail accounts to comply with the Presidential Records Act, which governs how those communications are protected and archived. Mr. Carney said there was no evidence that any White House accounts were compromised.

White House employees are permitted to have private e-mail accounts, he said, but cannot use them for work purposes.

Officials at the White House and other agencies often keep two computers in their offices, one for unclassified work and another for classified. Senior officials sometimes have a “secure facility” in their homes, in which computers and telephones are on dedicated lines and communications are encrypted.

Given its size, Google and its Gmail system will always make an attractive target.

Other personal e-mail services, including Yahoo and Microsoft’s Hotmail, have faced similar attacks, according to Trend Micro, a computer security company in Cupertino, Calif. “The types of attacks that are happening against Web mail users aren’t confined to Gmail alone and extend to other e-mail platforms,” said Nart Villeneuve, a senior threat researcher for Trend Micro.


View the original article here

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

The Lede: Syrians to March for Young Martyrs

A video report from Britain’s Channel 4 News on the death of a 13-year-old boy in Syria who has become an icon of the protest movement.

Syrians calling for President Bashar al-Assad to step down plan to march on Friday in memory of children who have been killed during the uprising, The Associated Press reports.

As my colleague Liam Stack explained earlier this week, images of the battered body of one young protester — a 13-year-old boy named Hamza Ali al-Khateeb whose remains were returned to his family last week — have sparked particular outrage since they began to circulate online.

The images come from a very graphic postmortem video, apparently filmed by the boy’s family before his funeral, which appeared to show that he was tortured and mutilated as well as shot and killed. (The video is so disturbing that it was briefly removed from YouTube last weekend, but it has now been reinstated.)

Video posted online by Syrian activists, said to to show last week’s funeral for a 13-year-old protester in Jiza, a southern Syrian village.

A commemorative Facebook page, called “We Are All the Child Martyr Hamza Ali al-Khateeb” — which echoes the “We Are All Khaled Said” page set up in honor of an Egyptian whose death at the hands of the police helped spark the revolution there — urged protesters to take to the streets on Friday for “The Day of Hamza.”

In an apparent attempt to tamp down the anger raised by the video of the young boy, whose death has been compared to that of the Iranian protester Neda Agha-Soltan, Syrian state television produced a report this week which, it said, “unveiled the truth about the story of martyr Hamza al-Khateeb.”

According to a young man featured in the television report, who claimed to have witnessed the boy’s shooting, he was not killed during a peaceful protest by the security forces but during a gun battle initiated by armed demonstrators who opened fire on Syrian soldiers.

Syria’s official news agency, SANA, added that a “professor of media psychology at Damascus University, Majdi Fares, said the incident of al-Khateeb’s death was used by some satellite channels and media in a biased way for misleading purposes through lies and fabrications.”

After Syrian activists reported that the boy’s father had been detained by the authorities following the release of the video of his son’s body, Syrian television broadcast a prerecorded interview with him on Tuesday, in which he praised Syria’s president.


View the original article here